See Bach Long Vi on Wiktionary
{ "head_templates": [ { "args": { "nolinkhead": "1" }, "expansion": "Bach Long Vi", "name": "en-proper noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "name", "senses": [ { "alt_of": [ { "word": "Bạch Long Vĩ" } ], "categories": [ { "kind": "other", "name": "English entries with incorrect language header", "parents": [ "Entries with incorrect language header", "Entry maintenance" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with 1 entry", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with entries", "parents": [], "source": "w" } ], "examples": [ { "ref": "2002, Henry J. Kenny, “Land Border and South China Sea Disputes”, in Shadow of the Dragon: Vietnam's Continuing Struggle with China and Its Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy, Brassey's, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, pages 60-61:", "text": "Bach Long Vi, the Vietnamese-held island in the gulf, was given no consideration in the demarcation, and with the exception of a small sector surrounding Vietnamese offshore islands in the northern end of the gulf, Vietnamese claims were rejected.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2005, Zou Keyuan, Law of the Sea in East Asia: Issues and prospects, Routledge, →ISBN, →OCLC, pages 84, 234:", "text": "The first approach mentioned above is certainly the one most preferred by Vietnam, because if it were applied, Bach Long Vi Island would extend the line of equidistance in Vietnam’s favor and would allocate an additional 1,700nm² of maritime zone to Vietnam.[…]\nBach Long Vi Island (Bai Long Wei Island) 50, 84", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2013, Bruce A. Elleman, “Sino-Vietnamese Border Disputes”, in Beijing's Power and China's Borders: Twenty Neighbors in Asia, M.E. Sharpe, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, page 301:", "text": "Logically, Vietnam took the position that Bach Long Vi Island should be fully included in any agreement on how to divide the Gulf. On the other hand, China had an interest in minimizing the impact that the island would have on any agreed delimitation. This could be done by either arguing that Bach Long Vi was not an island in accordance with the provisions of UNCLOS or by arguing that its impact should be minimized and possibly even be disregarded.¹⁷ For China to argue that it was only a “rock” and so was incapable of generating EEZ and continental shelf claims would have been counterproductive, as China had earlier controlled the island and had claimed that the island was inhabited before it was handed-over to Vietnam in the late 1950s.¹⁸ An analysis of the agreed boundary line show that Bach Long Vi was given only a reduced effect on the course of the delimitation process. Bach Long Vi was eventually given rights over 15 nm from the island. In terms of division of the whole Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam obtained 53.23 percent while China obtained 46.77 percent.¹⁹", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2016 June 28, “Vietnam recovers 8 bodies from missing search plane”, in AP News, archived from the original on 2024-01-06:", "text": "The Airbus-manufactured Casa-212 aircraft crashed near Bach Long Vi island in the Gulf of Tonkin on June 16 while searching for a fighter jet that went down two days earlier on a training flight.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "n.d., Hai Phong Deparment of Foreign Affairs, “Bach Long Vi – The island at the Homeland’s front line”, in Hai Phong News, archived from the original on 2022-06-30, Attractions:", "text": "Bach Long Vi is Vietnam’s farthest offshore island in Tonkin Gulf which is 140 km from the land, covers 2.5km² during tidal waves and 4km² during tidal withdrawal. For the time being, the number of dwellers on the island is 700 people, mostly making a living from fishing.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Alternative form of Bạch Long Vĩ." ], "id": "en-Bach_Long_Vi-en-name-jcmagueq", "links": [ [ "Bạch Long Vĩ", "Bạch Long Vĩ#English" ] ], "tags": [ "alt-of", "alternative" ] } ], "word": "Bach Long Vi" }
{ "head_templates": [ { "args": { "nolinkhead": "1" }, "expansion": "Bach Long Vi", "name": "en-proper noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "name", "senses": [ { "alt_of": [ { "word": "Bạch Long Vĩ" } ], "categories": [ "English entries with incorrect language header", "English lemmas", "English multiword terms", "English proper nouns", "English terms with quotations", "English uncountable nouns", "Pages with 1 entry", "Pages with entries" ], "examples": [ { "ref": "2002, Henry J. Kenny, “Land Border and South China Sea Disputes”, in Shadow of the Dragon: Vietnam's Continuing Struggle with China and Its Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy, Brassey's, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, pages 60-61:", "text": "Bach Long Vi, the Vietnamese-held island in the gulf, was given no consideration in the demarcation, and with the exception of a small sector surrounding Vietnamese offshore islands in the northern end of the gulf, Vietnamese claims were rejected.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2005, Zou Keyuan, Law of the Sea in East Asia: Issues and prospects, Routledge, →ISBN, →OCLC, pages 84, 234:", "text": "The first approach mentioned above is certainly the one most preferred by Vietnam, because if it were applied, Bach Long Vi Island would extend the line of equidistance in Vietnam’s favor and would allocate an additional 1,700nm² of maritime zone to Vietnam.[…]\nBach Long Vi Island (Bai Long Wei Island) 50, 84", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2013, Bruce A. Elleman, “Sino-Vietnamese Border Disputes”, in Beijing's Power and China's Borders: Twenty Neighbors in Asia, M.E. Sharpe, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, page 301:", "text": "Logically, Vietnam took the position that Bach Long Vi Island should be fully included in any agreement on how to divide the Gulf. On the other hand, China had an interest in minimizing the impact that the island would have on any agreed delimitation. This could be done by either arguing that Bach Long Vi was not an island in accordance with the provisions of UNCLOS or by arguing that its impact should be minimized and possibly even be disregarded.¹⁷ For China to argue that it was only a “rock” and so was incapable of generating EEZ and continental shelf claims would have been counterproductive, as China had earlier controlled the island and had claimed that the island was inhabited before it was handed-over to Vietnam in the late 1950s.¹⁸ An analysis of the agreed boundary line show that Bach Long Vi was given only a reduced effect on the course of the delimitation process. Bach Long Vi was eventually given rights over 15 nm from the island. In terms of division of the whole Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam obtained 53.23 percent while China obtained 46.77 percent.¹⁹", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2016 June 28, “Vietnam recovers 8 bodies from missing search plane”, in AP News, archived from the original on 2024-01-06:", "text": "The Airbus-manufactured Casa-212 aircraft crashed near Bach Long Vi island in the Gulf of Tonkin on June 16 while searching for a fighter jet that went down two days earlier on a training flight.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "n.d., Hai Phong Deparment of Foreign Affairs, “Bach Long Vi – The island at the Homeland’s front line”, in Hai Phong News, archived from the original on 2022-06-30, Attractions:", "text": "Bach Long Vi is Vietnam’s farthest offshore island in Tonkin Gulf which is 140 km from the land, covers 2.5km² during tidal waves and 4km² during tidal withdrawal. For the time being, the number of dwellers on the island is 700 people, mostly making a living from fishing.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Alternative form of Bạch Long Vĩ." ], "links": [ [ "Bạch Long Vĩ", "Bạch Long Vĩ#English" ] ], "tags": [ "alt-of", "alternative" ] } ], "word": "Bach Long Vi" }
Download raw JSONL data for Bach Long Vi meaning in All languages combined (3.7kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable All languages combined dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-11-06 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-10-02 using wiktextract (fbeafe8 and 7f03c9b). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.